Author Archives: David Russell, CFP

About David Russell, CFP

David Russell is Senior Vice President & Trust Officer for Pinnacle Trust Company in Madison, Mississippi. He is a 1982 graduate of Mississippi State University with a Bachelors Degree in Banking and Finance. He became a Certified Financial Planner in 1987. David has provided consulting services to individuals, professional advisors, and to non-profit organizations since 1984.

Seven tax law changes for 2013 that will increase your income tax bill.

Will Rogers once said, “The only two things in life that are certain are death and taxes; but at least death doesn’t get worse every time Congress gets together.” Now that you have just sent your check to Washington for your 2012 Federal Income Tax, what lies ahead for 2013 and 2014 could be even more troubling for many. Provisions under two major tax acts, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) signed into law in 2010 and The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 are likely to have significant impact on the personal income taxes paid by higher income Americans – much more than the seemingly modest increases in the marginal tax brackets for “wealthy Americans.”  Below are seven provisions scheduled to go into effect in 2013 that will potentially increase your tax bill next year.

  1. 0.9% additional Hospital Insurance (Medicare) tax on high income taxpayers.
    Under current law, an employee is liable for a Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI) tax equal to 1.45% of his or her covered wages. Self-employed individuals are subject to a HI tax of 2.9% of net self-employment income. Beginning in 2013, taxpayers with incomes above certain thresholds will pay an additional HI tax of .9%. For an employee, the additional .9% effectively increases the HI tax from 1.45% to 2.35% on income in excess of the applicable threshold. For self-employed taxpayers, the additional, tax of .9% effectively raises the HI rate to 3.8% of net self-employment income in excess of the applicable threshold. Also, for self-employed individuals, the additional .9% HI tax is not deductible.The thresholds are $250,000 in case of a joint return (the earnings of both spouses are considered) or a surviving spouse, $125,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 for any other taxpayer.

  2. 3.8% unearned income Medicare contribution.
    The new legislation imposes a 3.8% unearned income Medicare contribution tax on individuals, estates, and certain trusts. For individuals, the tax is 3.8% of the lesser of net investment income or the excess of modified adjusted gross income over a threshold amount. This threshold is $250,000 in the case of a joint return or a surviving spouse, $125,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case. Investment income, generally, refers to (1) income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents; (2) gross income from a business to which the tax applies (such as income from “passive” activities); and (3) the net gain from the disposition of certain property. The term does not include distributions from IRAs and other qualified retirement plans.
  3. Threshold for itemized deduction of unreimbursed medical expenses generally increased to 10%.
    Under current law, an individual is allowed an itemized deduction for regular tax purposes1 for unreimbursed medical expenses to the extent that such expenses exceed 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income (AGI). Beginning in 2013, the new legislation increases the threshold for the itemized deduction for unreimbursed medical expenses from 7.5% of AGI to 10% of AGI. However, for the years 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, if either a taxpayer or spouse is age 65 before the end of the taxable year, the threshold remains at 7.5%.
  4. New Tax Brackets and an additional 39.6% bracket for “high-income” earners.
    The former 10%, 15%, 25%, 33%, and 35% brackets are made permanent. A 39.6% rate will apply to taxable incomes above $450,000 (Married filing joint); 425,000 (Head of Household); $400,000 (Single); and $225,000 (Married filing separately).
  5. 20% Capital Gains Tax Rate for High Income Earners
    For taxpayers in the 39.6% bracket, a 20% tax rate will apply to long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. For those in the 25%, 28%, 33%, or 35% brackets, a 15% rate will apply. For those in the 10% or 15% brackets a 0% rate is applicable.
  6. Personal and Dependent Exemption Phase-Out.
    This provisions requires taxpayers whose income exceeds certain limits to phase-out their personal and dependent exemptions. For 2013 these limits are: $300,000 for Married filing joint; $275,000 for Head of Household; $250,000 for Single; and $150,000 for Married filing separately. The thresholds are subject to adjustment for inflation.
  7. Itemized Deductions Phase-Out
    Taxpayers whose incomes exceed specified limits must reduce certain, otherwise deductible, items on Schedule A. The same threshold amounts applicable to the personal exemption phase-out (see above) apply to the itemized deduction phase-out. These threshold amounts will be subject to adjustment for inflation in future years.

 What should you do now?

  1. Schedule a meeting with your CPA. Because there are many other provisions of these major tax acts, just how they will ultimately impact you depends on many factors. The best thing you can do over the next few months is to schedule a meeting with your CPA or tax advisor to do some advance calculations as to how your tax liability might change. Don’t wait too long to do this as it could result in you needing to increase your tax withholding or estimated payments.
  2. Implement a tax efficient investment plan. Your investment plan should be tweaked to minimize taxable investment income and high-turnover capital gains distributions. This will be a major theme for the next few years as investors seek to maximize after-tax returns on their portfolios and thus avoid some of these new taxes.

Tax rates will likely not head lower until our federal budget deficit and overall debt picture has improved. Nevertheless as Federal Judge Learned Hand once remarked,

“Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.”

1 Comment

Filed under Taxes

Will the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Affect You?

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. A companion package of “fixes to PPACA, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), was signed by the President on March 30, 2010. Taken together, these two bills make the most profound changes to our country’s private-market health care system in 50 years.

Many provisions of the new health reform law will impact American employers and private health consumers very soon, while others take effect over the course of the next eight years. For a number of provisions, the actual application and operation of the new law will remain hazy until the federal government creates and issues detailed regulations.

Most people I know have health insurance through their employers. However, these same people have college age or older children who are not finding employment that includes health benefits. Also after age 26, dependent children of covered employees are no longer covered on their parents’ health plans, so the coverage options, and the penalties for not getting coverage under these options, is something to pay attention to. – David Russell

To read more about the PPACA and how it might affect you or your family, click the link below.

 

David Russell serves as Senior Vice President of Pinnacle Trust.  You can email David at drussell@pinntrust.com or call him at 601–957-0323.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Financial Planning, Government & Money

Exercise Your Right to a Will

Writing a will is one of the oldest rights known to modern man. The privilege of property ownership carried with it the responsibility of securing the stewardship of that property after the death of the owner. Sadly, less than 50% of Americans exercise this fundamental right secured by the blood of our forefathers.

The images below display two of the oldest wills ever discovered. Dated to around 1797 BC, the wills were discovered by archaeologist William Mathew “Flinders” Petrie (1853-1942), in 1890.  Their discovery made legal historians review their theories about the evolution of law.  Not only do these documents demonstrate the practice of leaving property to another at death, but the 2nd will validates a woman’s right to inherit property; restricts the wife from tearing down the houses; names guardians for children; and bears the inscription of two witnesses.

early will

Copy of the title to property made by the devoted servant(?) of the superintendent of works, Ankh-ren. Year 44, month Peyni, day 13. Title to property made by the devoted servant of the superintendent of works, Shepset’s son, Ahy-senb, who is called Ankh-ren, of the Northern uart. All my property in marshland(?) and town(?) is for my brother the uab in charge of the corps of Sepdu lord of the East, Shepset’s son, Ahy-Senb, who is called Uah; all my associated persons(?) (are) for this brother of mine. These things were deposited in copy(?) at the office of the second registrar(?) of the South, in the year 44, month Paophi, day 13.

will of uah

Title to property made by the uab in charge of the corps of Sepdu lord of the East, Uah: I am making a title to property to my wife,  the woman of Ges-ab, Sat-Sepdu’s daughter Sheftu, who is called Teta, of all things given to me by my brother, the devoted servant of the superintendent of works, Ankh-ren, as to each article in its place of everything that he gave me. She shall give it to any she desires of her children that she bears (has borne ?) me. I am giving to her the eastern slaves, 4 persons, that my brother, the devoted servant of the superintendent of works, Ankh-ren, gave to me. She shall give them to whomsoever she will of her children. As to my tomb, let me be buried in it with my wife, without allowing anyone to move (?) earth to it. Moreover, as to the apartments that my brother, the confidential servant of the superintendent of works, Ankh-ren, built for me, my wife dwelleth (shall dwell ?) therein, without allowing her to be put (forth) thence on the ground by any person. It is the deputy Gebu who shall act as guardian of my son (lit. “be child-educator for my son”).

One legal scholar has commented that these wills are so well drafted that they would likely be viewed as valid even today!  However, I’m not sure how many chancery courts are familiar with hieroglyphics.

Question: Have you prepared or updated your will or do you prefer the state to divide your assets and determine the legal guardianship for your children? No one is too young, or possesses too small an estate to neglect this ancient and noble act. If you would like to discuss your estate plans, or need a referral to a qualified estate planning attorney, give us a call. – David Russell

David Russell serves as Senior Vice President of Pinnacle Trust.  You can email David at drussell@pinntrust.com or call him at 601–957-0323.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Estate Planning

The Need for Responsible Planning

DavidA few years ago, we inherited a treasure trove of old National Geographic magazines from a neighbor who moved away. Some date to the 1930’s and I love them as much for their advertisements as for the articles. These ads were made before the days of Madison Avenue “Madmen” and I love them for their raw emotional honesty. Many of the advertisers were insurance companies – most of which are still around today. These ads remind me of what a miracle product life insurance is, and despite all the bells and whistles, what its primary reason for existence was and still is: to safeguard your family and build guaranteed equity for the future.

Insurance Ad1

Many individuals recognize the benefits of planning for the future. Such efforts often uncover problems and frequently provide the motivation to make needed changes. For the most part, the issues involved are positive and enjoyable (e.g., retirement, well-educated children).

However, planning for the unexpected – known as risk management – can be less pleasant. A key part of risk management is answering the question, “What if I were to die today?” Preparing for an untimely death is often referred to as “survivor benefit planning.” A subset of estate planning, it addresses the need to keep one’s family in their current world, financially.

Insurance Ad3

 

 

 

Understandably, no one likes to contemplate his or her own demise. For some, death seems a distant, future event. Others are simply too “busy.” Whatever the reason, delaying this part of planning can result in expensive, unintended, even tragic consequences.

Insurance Ad2The ultimate purpose of survivor benefit planning is twofold: (1) to ensure that the ongoing income needs of the survivor(s) are met, and (2) to provide for immediate lump-sum cash needs.

· Income needs: How much income will the survivors need, now and in the future, to cover the following:

o Household living expenses: Will the family stay in the same house? Can they afford to? Do they want to? Will they have the option?

o Additional childcare: Will there be a need for more help with young children?

o Educational expenses: Will there be enough money for the children to go to college?

· Lump-sum needs: How much will the survivors need immediately and in cash? Consider the following:

o Final expenses: More than the funeral, this includes unpaid medical bills, which, after a long illness, can be substantial.

o Estate settlement costs: Probate expenses, attorney’s fees, death taxes, etc.

o Mortgage payoff and debt reduction: Will it be important to provide a paid-off house? Are there debts that should be retired?

One Final Question: If you died today, would your plan be ready? If you’re ready to contemplate this question, give us a call. We’ll review your current coverage, and use realistic assumptions to help calculate whether you have enough of this “miracle product.”  -David W. Russell, CFP®

David Russell is a Senior Vice President with Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach him at drussell@pinntrust.com or by calling 601-957-0323.

1 Comment

Filed under Creating a Family Legacy, Elder Care, Estate Planning, Taxes

An Update on Europe

maeveWith all of the focus on the fiscal cliff and the debt ceiling lately, the problems in Europe have been a little overlooked in the news. At Thursday’s Governing Council’s meeting, the ECB voted to maintain interest rates at 0.75%. ECB President Mario Draghi commented that economic weakness in the Eurozone will continue in the future months. Policymakers also expressed their concern on the impact of the rising euro. Before Thursday’s decline, the euro had risen more than 2 percent compared to the dollar this year and more than 10 percent versus the yen. Here is an update on what is going on in the Eurozone:

Italy

Political concerns have caused borrowing costs to increase. The spread charged to Italy to borrow has risen above 300 basis points over Germany’s borrowing cost. The Italian election is extremely important to the country’s economic health. A loss in the election by the center-left would not be good for austerity and reform objectives.

Ireland

Ireland made a deal with the ECB on Thursday decrease borrowing costs on funds that it took on in order to keep its banking system from collapsing. They are on track to end their reliance on European Union and IMF loans this year. They still face economic problems stemming from a banking and real estate crisis, but they are on the right track to see slow growth in 2013.

Greece

Greece is still in a horrendous economic and financial situation. However, Germany understands the importance of keeping Greece in the Eurozone to avoid contagion in the banking system and markets. Because of this, an EZ exit in 2013 is unlikely. Major reform and austerity still needs to occur. Implementation of these may cause unrest, which could again increase the chances of an exit from the EZ. 2013 will be a crucial year to see which path Greece takes.

Spain

A recession continues in Spain as they deal with austerity amidst a financial crisis, property bubble bursting, and high unemployment. They are also dealing with a corrupt Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy, and his political party, the Partido Popular. If problems persist, Spain may be forced to request financial aid from the ECB and ESM. The main risk with Spain is if the Partido Party refuses to put in place badly needed austerity measures and reformation.

Sluggish growth in 2013 is likely as long as countries like Greece, Italy, and Spain remain politically stable and more extensive rescue packages are not required. Hopefully, the austerity measures and structural reforms will take hold and slowly increase growth across the Eurozone.  – Maeve Wilson

Maeve Wilson serves as Investment Officer for Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach Maeve by emailing her at mwilson@pinntrust.com or calling 601-957-0323.

1 Comment

Filed under Economic Outlook, Government & Money

Market Digests Weak GDP

jeremyFourth quarter GDP growth came in well below expected at -0.1% annualized. This is the first decline in GDP growth since the second quarter of 2009. Hurricane Sandy, sharp cuts in government spending, a drag from inventories and a decline in net exports negatively affected the number. However, there were a few bright spots. Personal consumption, business investment and housing saw significant increases in growth from the third quarter.

Looking at the number there are two things to take away. First, the private sector seems to be improving. Second, cuts in government spending will hamper future economic growth. Pinnacle Trust estimates that if the federal government were to balance the budget overnight, we would see a -3.0% to a -4.0% hit to GDP. It is imperative that the budget get balanced, so the unwinding of fiscal stimulus will be a headwind to GDP growth in the coming years.

On the jobs front, businesses added 157,000 new jobs in January, according the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate moved up to 7.9%.

Despite a mediocre jobs report and weak GDP growth, the market rally continued. But why? The answer is QE. These numbers suggest that the Fed will continue loose monetary policy. Whether or not this is a good reason for the market to rally can be debated, but the fact remains that the market has shrugged of most bad news for the past four years in the name of the Fed.

For now, look for the market to move higher. We are getting overdue for a correction, but that might not come until the S&P approaches 1565. 1565 is the all-time high and will likely become a short-term resistance point for the stock market. Long-term, the direction of the market will be determined by private sector growth and how gracefully the Fed exits the equation. – Jeremy Nelson

Jeremy Nelson serves as Chief Investment Officer for Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach Jeremy by emailing him at jnelson@pinntrust.com or by calling our office at 601-957-0323.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economic Outlook, Market Update, Stocks

Self-Directed IRAs

DavidSelf-Directed IRA’s (SDIRA) can be a great way for individuals to invest IRA assets outside of traditional financial assets. With some limitations on permitted investments such as collectables, and non-U.S. minted coins, investors can direct IRA investments into such assets as investment real estate, limited liability companies that hold allowable assets, limited partnerships, mortgage notes, and even interests in closely held corporations as long as certain self-dealing rules that apply to ERISA Plans and IRA’s are followed.

clip_image001Because of the lackluster performance of traditional financial assets in the past decade it should be of no surprise that there has also been a rise in the number of fraudulent investments promoted through self-directed IRA schemes. As a result, the The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has issued a Fraud Alert warning investors of the potential abuses perpetrated by these schemes.

Unlike individual investment accounts, IRA’s are required to have a custodian. Typically the custodian is a brokerage firm, bank, or trust company. The custodian owes little duty to the investor other than certain record-keeping functions. Because the investor “self-directs” the investments, he or she is responsible for any due diligence on all investments held in the SDIRA. Many custodians refuse to offer self-directed IRA’s because of the potential liability for when an investment goes wrong. Even if the courts sides with the custodian, the costs often outweigh the benefits. As reported in the SEC alert.

Fraud promoters can misrepresent the responsibilities of self-directed IRA custodians to deceive investors into believing that their investments are legitimate or protected against losses. Fraud promoters often explicitly state or suggest that self-directed IRA custodians investigate and validate any investment in a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRA custodians are responsible only for holding and administering the assets in a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRA custodians generally do not evaluate the quality or legitimacy of any investment in the self-directed IRA or its promoters. Furthermore, most custodial agreements between a self-directed IRA custodian and an investor explicitly state that the self-directed IRA custodian has no responsibility for investment performance.

Just because an investment is allowable, or is not fraudulent, doesn’t mean that it’s a good idea for an IRA asset. The most common investment I see for SDIRA is investment real estate, but I also receive several requests each year to hold promissory notes, LLC and LP interests, or stock in closely held corporations. There are several issues that have to be evaluated when placing these assets into a SDIRA including:

· Loss of depreciation allowance on improved real estate,

· Loss of capital gains tax treatment on long term assets,

· Potential tax on the IRA due t0 Unrelated Business Taxable Income or “UBTI”

· A host of self-dealing rules to avoid making it nearly impossible to comply if there is a family member or close relative who controls or manages the entity,

· The need for annual appraisals in order for the custodian to file the Form 5498 with the IRS reporting the fair market value of the IRA,

· Required Distribution Rules that may force the distribution of a partial or divided interest if there is no liquidity in the IRA,

· Legal documents such as subscription agreements, disclosures, operating agreements or offering memorandums for certain types of investment entities must be provided before most reputable custodians are willing to serve.

Self-Directed IRAs are not a bad idea. It’s just not as simple as many would believe, or unfortunately as many unscrupulous promoters are saying they are. – David Russell

David Russell serves as Senior Vice President for Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach David by email at drussell@pinntrust.com or call him at 601-957-0323.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Financial Planning, Taxes, Wealth Building

Breadth Thrust Buy Signal

stacey10First developed by Martin Zweig, breadth thrust is a technical indicator used by stock analysts to ascertain the momentum of the market.  While there are different variations, breadth thrust indicators measure upside volume against downside volume. 

Ned Davis Research looked at cases where upside volume exceeded downside volume by 10:1 on the first day followed by at least 4:1 coverage the following day.  Twenty-eight such cases have occurred in the S&P 500 going all the way back to 1949.  The twenty-ninth case happened on January 2 of this year.  The mean and median performances of the S&P 500 following these breadth thrust buy signals is listed below.

S&P 500 % Gain Following Up/Down Volume > 10, >4

 

+10 Days

+ 1 Month

+3 Months

+6 Months

+9 Months

+12 Months

Mean

1.85

3.33

8.12

13.45

18.04

18.32

Median

1.87

3.17

8.11

13.59

18.52

19.53

 

Furthermore, the market was up 12 months after a breadth thrust buy signal was generated eighty-nine percent (89%) of the time (25 out of 28 cases).

At 328 days, the length of the current cyclical bull market indicates we may be overdue for some sort of correction (a healthy part of any market cycle).  However, for now our indicators continue to lean bullish. – Stacey Wall

1 Comment

Filed under Market Update, Stacey Wall Commentary, Stocks

Corporate or Individual Trustee?

warrenIf your prospective estate plan will utilize a trust to achieve at least some of its goals, you will then be faced with decisions about whom to name as trustee and how to provide for their replacement or succession. Family members or friends familiar with your situation often come to mind first, but serving as a trustee is a legal obligation with corresponding liability that many may not want to assume. Someone in the business of providing trust services may be your best solution, and without giving up the personal connections you desire.

There are two primary reasons to choose a corporate trustee: continuity and higher standards. First, even individuals that are perfectly capable of handling all aspects of trust responsibility can lose ability and interest over time, and everyone dies at some point. Replacing them may be untimely and/or difficult, no matter how detailed are the plan’s provisions. Trust officers come and go, too, but the entity they represent remains throughout.

Perhaps of more importance, trust companies or banks with trust powers are held by law to higher fiduciary standards than individuals. In addition, they are regularly subject to both independent audits and state or federal regulatory examinations of their operations. This oversight, combined with the permanence (and capital) of the corporate trustee, should impart a greater feeling of security of results compared to that of any individual trustee.

There are a myriad of “bells and whistles” options to add to your plan to keep desired family and friends involved, including advisory or protector committees. We are happy to discuss any of these matters with you.  – Warren Wiltshire

Warren Wiltshire serves as Chief Legal Counsel for Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach Warren by emailing him at wwiltshire@pinntrust.com or calling our office at 601-957-0323.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Creating a Family Legacy, Estate Planning, Life Balance

What to Make of the Debt Ceiling Debate

jeremySometime in the middle of February, the United States will hit a self-imposed $16.4 trillion debt ceiling. At that point the government will become insolvent, a shutdown will be imminent and the United States will be in danger of defaulting on its debt.

President Obama and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke insist that raising the debt ceiling does not authorize new government spending; it only authorizes the government to pay bills that it has already incurred. Technically they are right, but practically they are wrong.

In the summer of 2011, a last minute deal was cut to increase the debt ceiling to avoid default. To ensure that something was done about long-term deficit spending, sequestration was scheduled for 2013. As we all know by now, that can has been kicked down the road until March. Within 18 months, the new debt ceiling was reached and nothing had been done about the federal deficit. By increasing the debt ceiling, Congress avoided making the necessary tough decisions regarding fiscal spending. They also avoided mandatory spending cuts by pushing them further out.

It is time that Washington does something about its spending problem; yes they do have a spending problem. Currently, the government is spending 23.8% of GDP on an annual basis. Over the past 66 years, they have averaged 19.7%. That is a 4.1% difference. Based on GDP of $15.8 trillion, that means, on a historical basis, we are over spending by $647.8 billion dollars. As you will see below, as of 12/31/12, the budget deficit was $1.06 trillion.

deficit

Here is a practical solution for Washington: taxes went up on upper income people as promised in the 2012 elections. Now, let’s figure out how to cut the $647.8 billion beginning today. It doesn’t have to happen overnight, just over a reasonable period of time. Once that is done, we can debate whether the additional $358.2 billion dollars of annual deficits should come from additional cuts or increased taxes. Perhaps if we accomplish step one, enough confidence would be created that economic growth would take care of the $358.2 billion.  – Jeremy Nelson

Jeremy Nelson serves as Chief Investment Officer for Pinnacle Trust.  You can reach him at jnelson@pinntrust.com or by calling the office at 601-957-0323.

1 Comment

Filed under Economic Outlook, Government & Money, Taxes